The Delhi High Court grants a dynamic injunction in favor of designer Rahul Mishra, protecting his exclusive rights over his name and designs. This case sets a legal precedent in safeguarding intellectual property in the fashion industry against online piracy and counterfeiting.
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The case of Nandhini Deluxe Vs Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd.[1] serves as one of the landmark judgments that aims to deal with the issue of registration of a trademark in India. This case revolves around four judicial bodies namely – the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, the Intellectual Property
The doctrine of approbate and reprobate is rooted in the principle of equity that prevents a person from making contradictory statements or taking advantage of two contradicting positions in legal proceedings. It embodies the maxim, “allegans contraria non est audiendus,” meaning a person alleging contrary statements should not be heard. This principle
Explore how Ashneer Grover, the co-founder of BharatPe, is shaping the future of personality rights in India by securing a trademark for his name. This article delves into the concept of personality rights, their legal origins, and notable cases, including prominent figures like Amitabh Bachchan, Anil Kapoor, and Taylor Swift.
In a saga that has captivated legal experts and businesses alike, the trademark battle between Capital Foods Private Limited and Dabur India Limited has reignited conversations about the legal intricacies of descriptive marks and the thin line between genericity and distinctiveness. At the heart of the dispute lies the term
INTRODUCTION: THE PRINCIPLE OF PRIOR USE In the realm of trademark law, trademarks play a pivotal role in distinguishing the goods or services of one business from those of another. Under the Trademarks Act, 1999, the registration of a trademark grants the proprietor exclusive rights to its use, allowing them
In the evolving landscape of corporate and intellectual property law, the intersection between trademarks and company names has garnered significant attention. Trademark infringement through company names not only dilutes brand identity but also disrupts market dynamics, creating consumer confusion. This article analyzes the multifaceted legal framework, bolstered by landmark judicial
INTRODUCTION Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) encompass a range of protections guaranteed to several creators under the arena of Intellectual Property, ensuring that their works are protected and safeguarded from unauthorized usage. However, the multifaceted nature of IPR often results in overlaps, specifically in the diverse arena of applied arts. In
CASE NO: CS(COMM)-1073/2024 CNR NO: DLHC010882282024 DATE OF FILLING – 02 Dec 2024 FACTUAL BACKGROUND InterGlobe Aviation Limited, the parent company of IndiGo Airlines, has initiated legal proceedings against Mahindra Electric Automobile Limited (MEAL), a subsidiary of Mahindra & Mahindra, concerning the use of the term “6E” in connection with the latter’s
Section 9 and 11 of the Trademark Act, 1999, play a crucial role in the regulation of trademark registration in India. Section 9 outlines the absolute grounds for refusal, which include marks that are not distinctive, are merely descriptive, or contain scandalous or obscene elements. On the other hand, Section
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.