A recent controversy involving famous journalist and anchor Anjana Om Kashyap and several prominent YouTube educators has reignited the debate on the limits of free speech vs defamation in India. The controversy has also revived the broader debate of free speech vs defamation, particularly in the context of digital media, journalism, and online
INTRODUCTION: THE CORE CONCERN Over the past decade, India has rapidly digitised, and with that shift has come a growing uneasiness about how personal data is handled. Mobile phones have become central to everything from banking and work to basic communication, so people naturally worry about who has access to
Defamation lawsuits have become a hot topic in today’s legal landscape, especially in the era of social media and instant communication. It’s fascinating how a single statement, made with or without intent, can spiral into reputational damage and a court battle. You might be wondering, what exactly qualifies as defamation?
‘Ignorantia juris non excusat’. The mistake of law, in the Indian context, is not an excuse one is permitted to use in the courts of justice to get away with a crime. It thus becomes all the more pertinent that one is well versed in law, especially with regards to
“58. India’s international obligations and commitments in the present case (detailed in the preceding segments of this judgment) have not been enacted in domestic law. Regardless, the Court must be alive to these obligations while adjudicating writ petitions which seek reliefs that may hinder these obligations from being fulfilled or
A recent controversy involving famous journalist and anchor Anjana Om Kashyap and several prominent YouTube educators has reignited the debate on the limits of free speech vs
INTRODUCTION: THE CORE CONCERN Over the past decade, India has rapidly digitised, and with that shift has come a growing uneasiness about how personal data
Defamation lawsuits have become a hot topic in today’s legal landscape, especially in the era of social media and instant communication. It’s fascinating how a
‘Ignorantia juris non excusat’. The mistake of law, in the Indian context, is not an excuse one is permitted to use in the courts of
“58. India’s international obligations and commitments in the present case (detailed in the preceding segments of this judgment) have not been enacted in domestic law.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.