Illustration featuring popular internet meme characters under the title ‘Copyright & Digital Expression Over Memes,’ highlighting legal issues related to meme usage and copyright law.

Memes and Copyright: Who Owns the LOLs in the Digital Age?

ABSTRACT

In the age of internet, memes have become more than just jokes to serious weapons of expression, commentary, and advertising. Yet, their common usage poses severe legal issues, particularly with regards to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). This article explores the relationship between Memes and Copyright and helps us understand what is fair use and what constitutes copyright infringement.

It analyzes important legal notions under Indian copyright law, including Section 2(c), and explains how memes overlap with freedom of expression, parody, and satire. It also points out the biggest challenges to regulating memes, ranging from their anonymous origin to platform inconsistencies and AI-generated material. By exploring the gray areas of law and culture, this article seeks to illuminate who, if anyone, owns a meme and what that does for artists, content creators, and the meme consuming public. Lets understand the relationship between memes and copyright.

INTRODUCTION

Memes are now a form language for the world. From Dora The Explora to Panchayat, we witness images we know all warped into variations, numbering thousands, each a joke, a satire, or a marketing strategy. 

Memes as Expression (Memes and Copyright)

Memes are a contemporary mode of expression, commonly employed to:

  • Mock politicians or celebrities
  • Make commentary on issues concerning society
  • Satirize popular culture
  • Pass along relatable humour

This renders memes a valid form of speech particularly when they are transformative, original, or parodic.

But in an era where material is copied, remixed, and redistributed in a flash of time, an interesting legal concern arises: Who owns a LOLs? and what is the relationship between memes and copyright?

ORIGINAL MEMES AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?

Most memes technically qualify as copyright infringement, since they utilize copyrighted material without authorization. But just because they’re technically infringement doesn’t necessarily mean they’re illegal. This is where fair use comes into play.

Most memes are either:

  • Edited based on pre-existing images (movie screenshots, celebrity pics), or
  • Original works (sketches, screenshots, or edits).

Photographs and altered images are considered “artistic works” under Section 2(c) of The  Copyright Act, 1957 which is to say:

  • Original memes created by an author (such as a cartoon or satirical picture) are entitled to copyright protection as work of art.
  • Distribution of another person’s image or screenshot without consent could be a breach of their copyright, as the original picture is also covered under Section 2(c).

Example:

If a content creator or a comedian creates an original meme with a picture they took and the words they wrote that meme qualifies as their work under 2(c), and they are entitled to copyright.

But if a person goes and photographs a still from a movie (e.g., from Squid Games) and places a joke caption upon it to create a meme that original still is copyrighted and using it could be an infringement on the copyright owner’s rights, even though the caption is humorous or transformative.

COPYRIGHT VS. FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN MEMES

In the era of viral content, memes are more than jokes now, they’re instruments of satire, social commentary, political speech, and even protest. 

But here’s a catch: Can freedom of speech cover a meme that uses copyrighted material?

Let’s discuss.

What the Law Says (Memes and Copyright)

  • Freedom of speech in India is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
  • However, this right is not absolute. It is subject to “reasonable restrictions” under Article 19(2), such as public order, morality, and most importantly intellectual property rights.

So yes, you can be free to speak but not by copying someone else’s copyrighted material unlawfully.

CHALLENGES SURROUNDING MEMES AND COPYRIGHT

Memes are quick, hilarious, and viral but they’re also legally unsafe. Governments, platforms, and creators are all trying to regulate them, but why? Because memes exist at the intersection of free speech, intellectual property, technology, and culture.

These are the primary challenges of regulating memes:

1) Speed & Volumes of Sharing: Memes go viral on platforms like a wildfire specially on Instagram, Reddit, Twitter, WhatsApp, and so forth. By the time someone files a takedown request, the meme has already been reshared, remixed, and reborn a hundred times.

    Challenge: Enforcing is nearly impossible in real time.

    2) Anonymity & Untraceable Creators: Most viral memes come from anonymous users or private meme pages. There is no explicit author, and it’s challenging to trace the original source.

    Challenge: Not knowing who made it, makes enforcing IP or legal liability difficult.

    3) Fair Use vs. Infringement – The Gray Area: Most memes would qualify as parody or satire, which may be eligible for fair dealing (in India) or fair use (elsewhere). But there is no hard legal test, every case relies on interpretation.

    Challenge: No easy rulebook, so legal results differ.

    4) Jurisdictional Confusion: A meme made in the U.S., shared in India, reposted from a server in Singapore, Who Has Jurisdiction? IP laws vary by country, but the internet doesn’t.

    Challenge: Cross-border enforcement of IPR is extremely complicated.

    5) Transformation vs. Copying: A meme can transform a work (add humour or context), but just How Much Is Enough? There’s no legal equation to determine when a meme is sufficiently original to qualify for protection or infringement.

    Challenge: Legal standards can’t catch up with innovative remix culture.

    6) Commercialization of Memes: When people use memes for recreational purposes, nobody notices. But when companies, influencers, or advertisers use memes without asking the copyright owners, then the issues rise.

    Challenge: The same meme can be acceptable for private use but against the law when used commercially disentangling ethical and legal boundaries.

    7) Platform Policies Are Inconsistent: Social media sites rely on AI and user reports to moderate content. But on YouTube, what’s removed for copyright violation could spread like wildfire on Twitter.

    Challenge: Different policies on platforms cause confusion and unjust removals of the artist’s work.

    8) AI-Generated and Deepfake Memes: It’s becoming increasingly difficult to discern what’s original, what’s fake, and what’s copied using AI tools such as meme generators and deepfakes. These tools make attribution and legal ownership more complex.

    Challenge: New technology makes legal lines even less distinct.

    CONCLUSION (MEMES AND COPYRIGHT)

    Memes are the internet’s cultural currency passed on in seconds, remixed and never given credit. But beneath each viral meme is a mess of legal threads. Freedom of speech permits satire and criticism, but copyright exists to safeguard original works of creativity turning memes into a legal paradox in most instances. Indian copyright law, by provisions such as Section 2(c) and fair dealing under Section 52, does offer some protection, but the fast pace of internet culture usually leaves these frameworks behind.

    Regulating memes is a daunting task because of issues such as anonymity, transnational sharing, platform disparities, and the emergence of AI. For the time being, most memes are in a legal limbo, depending more on cultural conventions than on court decisions. As the internet keeps changing, the lawmakers, creators, and platforms will have to collaborate to strike a balance one that honors creativity and ownership without suppressing humor, criticism, or free speech.

    In the end, memes may be funny, but their legal implications are anything but a joke.

    Wish to read similar articles? Click the link to read more: https://jpassociates.co.in/blog-copyright-infringement/

    Link to WIPO’s official website: https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html

    Share this post

    Disclaimer & Confirmation

    As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:

    • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
    • The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;
    • The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of the information obtained from this website site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

    The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.