The Madras High Court’s ruling in The Procter & Gamble Company v. IPI India Pvt. Ltd. marks a significant development in Indian trademark jurisprudence by reaffirming that descriptive and publici juris terms cannot be monopolized without clear proof of acquired distinctiveness. In rejecting P&G’s claim over the prefix “Vapo” derived
The landmark Supreme Court case of Parle Products (P) Ltd. vs. J.P. & Co. (1972) is a pivotal judgment in Indian trademark law that clarified the concept of deceptive similarity and trade dress infringement. The Court held that overall visual impression, packaging, colour scheme, and design must be considered when
Discover how trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, copyright, and plant variety protection shape Lay’s IP strategy in the FMCG industry.
What are Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)? Understand FRAND licensing, role of SSOs, patent monopoly vs standards, and key Indian SEP judgments.
A detailed legal analysis of moral rights under Section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957 vis-à-vis employer–employee authorship under Section 17(c), examined through the Delhi High Court’s decision in Gaurav Garg v. Aly Morani & Ors. (2026 SCC OnLine Del 136).
A detailed analysis of unconventional trademarks in India, including sound, colour, smell, shape and motion marks, their legal recognition, registration challenges, and key judicial precedents under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Trademark Rules, 2017.
Bombay High Court recognises Shaadi.com as a well-known trademark. Read a legal analysis of goodwill, cybersquatting, and trademark protection under Indian law.
This article explores how sensory branding is changing trademark protection in experience-driven industries like hospitality and evaluates the legal framework protecting Sound Markings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 using Taj Hotels as a case study.
An in-depth analysis of Leayan Global v. Bata India Ltd (2025) examining protection of suggestive trademarks, dominant mark theory, initial interest confusion, and trademark infringement under Indian law.
How much IP is present in a Dyson Airwrap ? Explore patents, trademarks, design rights, copyrights, and trade secrets behind Dyson’s revolutionary hair styling technology and brand dominance.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.