Madhya Pradesh’s first John Doe order passed by Gwalior Commercial Court in a pharmaceutical counterfeiting case, strengthening IP enforcement and public health protection.
An in-depth legal analysis of Novo Nordisk AS v. Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Limited & Anr. (2025), examining patent evergreening, species versus genus patents, and the scope of the Bolar Exemption under Indian patent law in the context of Semaglutide.
An analysis of the Lay’s vs Jay’s trademark dispute, explaining how phonetic similarity led to cancellation under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Discover a complete guide to India’s new Labour Codes 2025, covering the Code on Wages, Industrial Relations Code, Social Security Code and OSHWC Code. Learn major changes, simplified compliance, employer responsibilities and enhanced worker protections under the newly implemented labour reforms.
Discover how Sumitomo’s rose-scented tyre became India’s first registered olfactory trademark. Explore the landmark legal case, scientific 7-dimensional smell representation, and the future of non-traditional trademarks in India.
Learn the complete requirements of Rule 43 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 for filing a notice of opposition under Section 21. Understand mandatory details, opponent information, grounds of opposition, and verification rules
This article explains the complete trademark opposition process under Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, including filing an opposition, submitting a counter-statement, evidence stages, hearings, and the Registrar’s decision, ensuring transparency and protection of trademark rights in India.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Novenco Building & Industry A/S v. Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1256) defines when a commercial suit can bypass pre-institution mediation under Section 12A. The Court held that ongoing IP infringements inherently involve urgency, as each act causes fresh harm and misleads
Explore how the doctrine of acquiescence shapes trademark law under Section 33 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, balancing equity, delay, and vigilance.
Deepfake misuse case: Bombay High Court protects Suniel Shetty’s personality rights from AI deepfake abuse and false endorsements. Key legal ruling in 2025 explained.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.