INTRODUCTION A case emerged where German athletic company Adidas filed a petition in the Delhi High Court against Keshav H. Tulsiani, who sells wholesale sportswear in Connaught Place, Delhi, for unauthorized use of its registered trademark. Tulsiani defended himself by stating that he named his label “ADIDAS” after his favorite
Background Supermac is a fast food chain based in Ireland, founded by Pat Mc Donagh in 1978. It is Ireland’s largest indigenous quick service restaurant group. The company has been growing and operating more than 100 outlets across Ireland and Northern Ireland. Mc Donald’s, on the other hand, is an
FACTS Mr. Dhruv Rathee, a social media influencer and YouTuber, faced a dispute with Dabur India Limited due to his use of a partially blurred logo of Real Fruit Juice in a promotional video comparing carbonated drinks and fruit beverages. Dabur filed a petition in the Calcutta High Court, alleging
Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Beiersdorf AG vs. Hindustan Unilever Limited. The case explores issues of competitive advertising, trademark rights, deceptive marketing, and brand identification between NIVEA Crème and Ponds Superlight Gel.
INTRODUCTION Independent News Service Private Limited, a company incorporated in 1997, and its Chairman and Editor-in-Chief, Shri Rajat Sharma, a renowned news presenter and anchor who has hosted, program like, ‘Aap Ki Adalat,’ the longest-running television show in India, has recently moved to the Delhi High Court for the protection
Introduction Recently, a Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of Mr Justice C. Hari Shankar. The judgement dwells into the complexities of trademark law, weighing the need of maintaining a brand’s identity while still allowing for healthy market competition. It emphasizes the importance of a trademark’s distinctiveness
A detailed overview of the trademark dispute between Forest Essentials and Baby Forest Ayurveda, highlighting the complexities of protecting generic terms in competitive markets. Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling, the arguments from both parties, and the implications for trademark law and brand identity.
Trademark conflicts are common for renowned brands like NIKE, APPLE, and GUCCI. Domino’s is no stranger to such disputes. This article addresses various trademark infringement cases, focusing on the recent conflict between Domino’s India and a Punjab-based food outlet named “Donito’s.” The article also explores relevant Indian intellectual property laws,
Explore the legal battle between Lotus Herbal and DPKA over the trademark ‘Lotus Splash’ for a facewash product, as the Delhi High Court evaluates trademark infringement claims and weighs the protection under Section 30(2)(a) of The Trade Marks Act, 1999, ultimately dismissing Lotus Herbal’s petition.
INTRODUCTION The Delhi High Court, in its recent ruling, marked a critical step in defending Khandelwal Edible Oils Limited’s (herein referred to as Plaintiff) intellectual property rights, by granting an interim injunction to them in their trademark and copyright infringement case against Landsmill Agro Private Limited (herein referred to as
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.