The landmark Supreme Court case of Parle Products (P) Ltd. vs. J.P. & Co. (1972) is a pivotal judgment in Indian trademark law that clarified the concept of deceptive similarity and trade dress infringement. The Court held that overall visual impression, packaging, colour scheme, and design must be considered when
An in-depth analysis of Leayan Global v. Bata India Ltd (2025) examining protection of suggestive trademarks, dominant mark theory, initial interest confusion, and trademark infringement under Indian law.
Calcutta High Court restrains Shimla Drugs from selling Liv.72 for being deceptively similar to Himalaya’s Liv.52, reinforcing trademark protection, trade dress rights, and consumer safety under Indian trademark law.
“Champak” trademark dispute heats up as BCCI’s robotic dog name clashes with a beloved children’s magazine. Legal battle highlights brand protection in AI age.
Explore the comprehensive analysis of the Lacoste v. Crocodile International case, detailing the background, facts, key issues, arguments, and judgment. Understand how the Delhi High Court addressed the copyright and trademark dispute over the iconic crocodile logos in the fashion industry. Learn about the legal intricacies of intellectual property rights
Learn how the Delhi High Court granted an injunction in the Aashiqui trademark dispute between Vishesh Films and T-Series. Explore the legal battle over the rights to the iconic Aashiqui film franchise and the implications of trademark law in India’s entertainment industry.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.