Learn how Neela Film Productions secured a John Doe (Ashok Kumar) order from the Delhi High Court to protect its intellectual property rights in the iconic TV show Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, addressing rampant online infringement and unauthorized use of its characters and content.
The Rule of Anti-Dissection and The Rule of Dominant Feature often accompany each other when discussed in the context of trademark infringements. These two rules are among the most commonly used in determining possible trademark infringements and are notable because, throughout legal history, they have often been seen as antithetical
Discover the details of the landmark ADIDAS trademark dispute in the Delhi High Court, where the court upheld Adidas AG’s rights against Keshav H. Tulsiani’s unauthorized use of the ADIDAS trademark, highlighting key legal issues, the court’s decision, and the importance of trademark protection.
Explore the David vs Goliath battle in the case of Supermac’s (Holdings) Ltd. v. McDonald’s International Property Company, Ltd over a Trademark “Big Mac”. The article contains EUIPO ruling and the provisions that are similar in Indian Trademark Law and European Trademark Law.
This article provides an overview of the “Dhruv Rathee vs. Dabur India Limited” case, covering various aspects including trademarks, the Copyright Act, and the Constitution of India. It emphasizes the importance of balancing freedom of speech with intellectual property rights. The discussion includes detailed exploration of facts and relevant laws,
Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Beiersdorf AG vs. Hindustan Unilever Limited. The case explores issues of competitive advertising, trademark rights, deceptive marketing, and brand identification between NIVEA Crème and Ponds Superlight Gel.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgement in the trademark dispute between Independent News Service Private Limited v. Ravindra Kumar Chaudhary, where the Court restrained the use of “Baap ki adalat”, protecting Rajat sharma personality rights. This case highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property rights.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment in the trademark dispute between PhonePe and BharatPe. Understand the complexities of trademark law, the arguments from both sides, and the court’s application of legal principles like the Pianotist Test, Anti-Dissection Rule, and Dominant Mark Test. Discover the intricacies of maintaining brand identity amidst
A detailed overview of the trademark dispute between Forest Essentials and Baby Forest Ayurveda, highlighting the complexities of protecting generic terms in competitive markets. Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling, the arguments from both parties, and the implications for trademark law and brand identity.
Trademark conflicts are common for renowned brands like NIKE, APPLE, and GUCCI. Domino’s is no stranger to such disputes. This article addresses various trademark infringement cases, focusing on the recent conflict between Domino’s India and a Punjab-based food outlet named “Donito’s.” The article also explores relevant Indian intellectual property laws,
J.P. Associates
320, Tulsi Vihar, Behind SBI Zonal Office,
City Center, Gwalior – 474011 (M.P.)
Contact No. : +91 9827064067, 9826654067
Email : contact@jpassociates.co.in
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
