Learn how Local Commissioners under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC play a critical role in intellectual property enforcement. Discover the importance of identity masking in IP litigation to prevent evidence tampering, counterfeiting, and software piracy. Explore case laws, recommended strategies, and real-world applications of ex-parte orders to strengthen IP protection.
The Delhi High Court grants a dynamic injunction in favor of designer Rahul Mishra, protecting his exclusive rights over his name and designs. This case sets a legal precedent in safeguarding intellectual property in the fashion industry against online piracy and counterfeiting.
The trademark dispute between Capital Foods and Dabur over the term ‘Schezwan Chutney’ sheds light on the legal challenges of protecting descriptive marks. This article delves into the complexities of distinctiveness, consumer confusion, and fair competition under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Explore the evolving judicial perspective on descriptive trademarks
Explore the intersection of trademarks and company names, focusing on trademark infringement through company names under Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Section 29(5) of the Trademarks Act, 1999. Learn about legal provisions, judicial precedents, and practical remedies to protect brand identity.
Trademark for Startups is more than a legal formality, rather it is a prominent step towards brand reservation and growth in India’s competitively growing contemporary market. Early Trademark Registration ensures legal ownership of a brand’s name, logo, tagline etc., helping startups while also securing their unique identity in the market.
Learn how Neela Film Productions secured a John Doe (Ashok Kumar) order from the Delhi High Court to protect its intellectual property rights in the iconic TV show Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, addressing rampant online infringement and unauthorized use of its characters and content.
The Rule of Anti-Dissection and The Rule of Dominant Feature often accompany each other when discussed in the context of trademark infringements. These two rules are among the most commonly used in determining possible trademark infringements and are notable because, throughout legal history, they have often been seen as antithetical
Discover the details of the landmark ADIDAS trademark dispute in the Delhi High Court, where the court upheld Adidas AG’s rights against Keshav H. Tulsiani’s unauthorized use of the ADIDAS trademark, highlighting key legal issues, the court’s decision, and the importance of trademark protection.
Explore the David vs Goliath battle in the case of Supermac’s (Holdings) Ltd. v. McDonald’s International Property Company, Ltd over a Trademark “Big Mac”. The article contains EUIPO ruling and the provisions that are similar in Indian Trademark Law and European Trademark Law.
This article provides an overview of the “Dhruv Rathee vs. Dabur India Limited” case, covering various aspects including trademarks, the Copyright Act, and the Constitution of India. It emphasizes the importance of balancing freedom of speech with intellectual property rights. The discussion includes detailed exploration of facts and relevant laws,
J.P. Associates
320, Tulsi Vihar, Behind SBI Zonal Office,
City Center, Gwalior – 474011 (M.P.)
Contact No. : +91 9827064067, 9826654067
Email : contact@jpassociates.co.in
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
