News & Blogs

An illustration of the ongoing trademark dispute between Capital Foods and Dabur over the term "Schezwan Chutney."

Trademark Dispute Over ‘Schezwan Chutney’: Capital Foods vs. Dabur

The trademark dispute between Capital Foods and Dabur over the term ‘Schezwan Chutney’ sheds light on the legal challenges of protecting descriptive marks. This article delves into the complexities of distinctiveness, consumer confusion, and fair competition under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Explore the evolving judicial perspective on descriptive trademarks

Read More »

PhonePe V. BharatPe: Trademark Dispute

Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment in the trademark dispute between PhonePe and BharatPe. Understand the complexities of trademark law, the arguments from both sides, and the court’s application of legal principles like the Pianotist Test, Anti-Dissection Rule, and Dominant Mark Test. Discover the intricacies of maintaining brand identity amidst

Read More »

DELHI HIGH COURT DECISION: HAWKINS COOKERS LTD. VS. MAGICOOK APPLIANCES CO.

Explore the Delhi High Court’s pivotal decision in Hawkins Cookers Ltd. vs. Magicook Appliances Co., underscoring key legal principles of copyright protection and intellectual property rights. The judgment underscores the significance of preventing deceptive practices in the market and provides insights into remedies available under the Copyright Act 1957.

Read More »

NAVIGATING THE TRADEMARK AND DESIGN OVERLAP IN INDIA

Explore the intricate overlap between trademarks and designs in India’s intellectual property landscape. Dive into legal precedents, the nuances of infringement versus passing off, and proposed legislative and practical solutions to navigate this complex intersection effectively

Read More »

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:

  • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
  • The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;
  • The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of the information obtained from this website site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.