Discover the details of the landmark ADIDAS trademark dispute in the Delhi High Court, where the court upheld Adidas AG’s rights against Keshav H. Tulsiani’s unauthorized use of the ADIDAS trademark, highlighting key legal issues, the court’s decision, and the importance of trademark protection.
Discover the intricate details of the landmark case involving KG Marketing India and the trademark ‘SURYA,’ where the Delhi High Court navigates allegations of infringement, document authenticity, and the implications of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). Understand the court’s rationale and the importance of procedural continuity in intellectual
The article provides a detailed analysis of the Madras High Court’s ruling on advocate advertisements, emphasizing the ethical standards of the legal profession in India and the prohibition of commercialization. It highlights the implications for advocates and online platforms, reaffirming the nobility of legal services.
Learn about the Draft Trade Marks (Holding Inquiry and Appeal) Rules, 2024 published by the DPIIT, which aims to enhance the trademark registration process in India through digital transformation, clear procedural guidelines, and efficient adjudication and appeal processes.
Participate in the JP Associates Article Writing Competition on Intellectual Property Rights. Open to law students and LLM candidates, this competition offers cash prizes, publication opportunities, and a month-long internship. Submit your article by 28th July 2024 and showcase your expertise in legal writing. Follow JP Associates on LinkedIn for
Explore the David vs Goliath battle in the case of Supermac’s (Holdings) Ltd. v. McDonald’s International Property Company, Ltd over a Trademark “Big Mac”. The article contains EUIPO ruling and the provisions that are similar in Indian Trademark Law and European Trademark Law.
Discover how Bollywood filmmaker Karan Johar secured temporary legal relief from the Bombay High Court against the unauthorized use of his name in the film title “Shaadi ke Director Karan aur Johar”. This case highlights the protection of celebrity identity rights and the implications for Bollywood’s legal landscape.
Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Beiersdorf AG vs. Hindustan Unilever Limited. The case explores issues of competitive advertising, trademark rights, deceptive marketing, and brand identification between NIVEA Crème and Ponds Superlight Gel.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgement in the trademark dispute between Independent News Service Private Limited v. Ravindra Kumar Chaudhary, where the Court restrained the use of “Baap ki adalat”, protecting Rajat sharma personality rights. This case highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property rights.
A detailed overview of the trademark dispute between Forest Essentials and Baby Forest Ayurveda, highlighting the complexities of protecting generic terms in competitive markets. Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling, the arguments from both parties, and the implications for trademark law and brand identity.
J.P. Associates
320, Tulsi Vihar, Behind SBI Zonal Office,
City Center, Gwalior – 474011 (M.P.)
Contact No. : +91 9827064067, 9826654067
Email : contact@jpassociates.co.in
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
