A detailed analysis of the ongoing trademark dispute between IndiGo Airlines and Mahindra Electric regarding the use of the “6E” mark. IndiGo, which has used the “6E” trademark for 18 years, claims that Mahindra’s new electric SUV, initially named “BE 6e,” infringes upon its registered mark, potentially causing consumer confusion.
Explore the landmark case of Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs. Union of India, challenging the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The case examines constitutional principles of secularism, religious freedom, and judicial remedies for historical wrongs. Stay updated on the latest developments and implications for India’s legal landscape.
Recent changes in copyright law now require public venues hosting weddings to obtain music licensing like Public Performance License (PPL), NOVEX, and Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS) registrations. Previously exempt, wedding ceremonies must now comply with licensing rules under the DPIIT’s November 2024 order. This mandate aims to ensure that
Explore the historical evolution of Waqf in India, a charitable Islamic trust, and its legal framework. From its origins under Islamic rulers to its transformation under British colonial rule and post-independence reforms, this article delves into key legislation such as the Waqf Act, 1954, the Waqf Amendment Act, 2013, and
Explore the comprehensive analysis of the Lacoste v. Crocodile International case, detailing the background, facts, key issues, arguments, and judgment. Understand how the Delhi High Court addressed the copyright and trademark dispute over the iconic crocodile logos in the fashion industry. Learn about the legal intricacies of intellectual property rights
Learn how the Delhi High Court granted an injunction in the Aashiqui trademark dispute between Vishesh Films and T-Series. Explore the legal battle over the rights to the iconic Aashiqui film franchise and the implications of trademark law in India’s entertainment industry.
Learn how Neela Film Productions secured a John Doe (Ashok Kumar) order from the Delhi High Court to protect its intellectual property rights in the iconic TV show Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, addressing rampant online infringement and unauthorized use of its characters and content.
Bombay High Court ruled in favor of Arijit Singh, affirming his personality rights against unauthorized use of his name, voice, and image. Justice R.I. Chagla’s decision addresses AI and digital exploitation, granting Singh protection and injunctions to safeguard his personal attributes.
Explore the intersection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and traditional knowledge in India. This article examines the importance of protecting traditional wisdom, legal frameworks, and mechanisms for safeguarding cultural heritage. Learn about key cases, such as the turmeric and neem tree patents, and India’s proactive measures to prevent bio-piracy and
The Calcutta High Court invalidated orders by unauthorized Associate Managers of Trade Marks, ensuring proper authorization under Section 3(2) of the Trade Marks Act. This ruling provides clarity and relief to trademark practitioners, reinforcing the need for duly empowered officials to handle quasi-judicial functions.
J.P. Associates
320, Tulsi Vihar, Behind SBI Zonal Office,
City Center, Gwalior – 474011 (M.P.)
Contact No. : +91 9827064067, 9826654067
Email : contact@jpassociates.co.in
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
