Learn about the overlaps between different IPR protections, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, design rights, and trade secrets. Understand how these protections coexist, with examples, to enhance your intellectual property strategy.
This article explores the challenges and legal frameworks surrounding design protection in the fashion industry, highlighting critical cases, constitutional foundations, and the role of various intellectual property laws in safeguarding creativity. It examines the limitations of the current legal structure and suggests future directions for enhancing design rights, including the
The Calcutta High Court invalidated orders by unauthorized Associate Managers of Trade Marks, ensuring proper authorization under Section 3(2) of the Trade Marks Act. This ruling provides clarity and relief to trademark practitioners, reinforcing the need for duly empowered officials to handle quasi-judicial functions.
The Rule of Anti-Dissection and The Rule of Dominant Feature often accompany each other when discussed in the context of trademark infringements. These two rules are among the most commonly used in determining possible trademark infringements and are notable because, throughout legal history, they have often been seen as antithetical
Discover the details of the landmark ADIDAS trademark dispute in the Delhi High Court, where the court upheld Adidas AG’s rights against Keshav H. Tulsiani’s unauthorized use of the ADIDAS trademark, highlighting key legal issues, the court’s decision, and the importance of trademark protection.
Explore the David vs Goliath battle in the case of Supermac’s (Holdings) Ltd. v. McDonald’s International Property Company, Ltd over a Trademark “Big Mac”. The article contains EUIPO ruling and the provisions that are similar in Indian Trademark Law and European Trademark Law.
This article provides an overview of the “Dhruv Rathee vs. Dabur India Limited” case, covering various aspects including trademarks, the Copyright Act, and the Constitution of India. It emphasizes the importance of balancing freedom of speech with intellectual property rights. The discussion includes detailed exploration of facts and relevant laws,
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment in the trademark dispute between PhonePe and BharatPe. Understand the complexities of trademark law, the arguments from both sides, and the court’s application of legal principles like the Pianotist Test, Anti-Dissection Rule, and Dominant Mark Test. Discover the intricacies of maintaining brand identity amidst
A detailed overview of the trademark dispute between Forest Essentials and Baby Forest Ayurveda, highlighting the complexities of protecting generic terms in competitive markets. Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling, the arguments from both parties, and the implications for trademark law and brand identity.
Trademark conflicts are common for renowned brands like NIKE, APPLE, and GUCCI. Domino’s is no stranger to such disputes. This article addresses various trademark infringement cases, focusing on the recent conflict between Domino’s India and a Punjab-based food outlet named “Donito’s.” The article also explores relevant Indian intellectual property laws,
J.P. Associates
320, Tulsi Vihar, Behind SBI Zonal Office,
City Center, Gwalior – 474011 (M.P.)
Contact No. : +91 9827064067, 9826654067
Email : contact@jpassociates.co.in
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
