Detailed Analysis of Lacoste v. Crocodile International Case: Copyright and Trademark Dispute in India
Explore the comprehensive analysis of the Lacoste v. Crocodile International case, detailing the background, facts, key issues, arguments, and judgment. Understand how the Delhi High Court addressed the copyright and trademark dispute over the iconic crocodile logos in the fashion industry. Learn about the legal intricacies of intellectual property rights and the impact of co-existence agreements in India.
Read more
Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah and the Role of John Doe Orders in IP Protection
Learn how Neela Film Productions secured a John Doe (Ashok Kumar) order from the Delhi High Court to protect its intellectual property rights in the iconic TV show Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, addressing rampant online infringement and unauthorized use of its characters and content.
Read more
Cyberlocker Websites and the Legal Battle: The Landmark Case of Universal City Studios LLC v. Mixdrop
The Delhi High Court’s decision in Universal City Studios LLC & Ors. v. Mixdrop.co & Ors. addresses online piracy facilitated by cyberlocker websites, highlighting the legal challenges and implications for intellectual property protection in the digital age.
Read more
How Anti-Dissection and Dominant Feature Rules Complement Each Other in Trademark Cases
The Rule of Anti-Dissection and The Rule of Dominant Feature often accompany each other when discussed in the context of trademark infringements. These two rules are among the most commonly used in determining possible trademark infringements and are notable because, throughout legal history, they have often been seen as antithetical to each other, leading to many wrongly drawn conclusions. At the very onset of this article, it is therefore important to establish that the principles of anti-dissection and the identification of dominant feature are not antithetical to one another and, if viewed holistically, rather complement each other.
Read more
Ensuring Diligence in Patent Processes: Delhi High Court Mandates Code of Conduct for Patent & Trademark Agents
In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court has directed the CGPDTM to frame a comprehensive code of conduct for patent agents following a pivotal case of patent abandonment. This decision underscores the need for accountability and professionalism in patent processes, protecting the interests of diligent inventors.
Read more
Sibling Admiration vs. Corporate Identity: The ADIDAS Trademark Dispute in Delhi High Court
Discover the details of the landmark ADIDAS trademark dispute in the Delhi High Court, where the court upheld Adidas AG’s rights against Keshav H. Tulsiani’s unauthorized use of the ADIDAS trademark, highlighting key legal issues, the court’s decision, and the importance of trademark protection.
Read more
NIVEA V. PONDS: DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING & TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Beiersdorf AG vs. Hindustan Unilever Limited. The case explores issues of competitive advertising, trademark rights, deceptive marketing, and brand identification between NIVEA Crème and Ponds Superlight Gel.
Read more
TRADEMARK DISPUTE: AAP KI ADALAT VS BAAP KI ADALAT
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgement in the trademark dispute between Independent News Service Private Limited v. Ravindra Kumar Chaudhary, where the Court restrained the use of “Baap ki adalat”, protecting Rajat sharma personality rights. This case highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property rights.
Read more
Trademark Dispute: Forest Essentials vs. Baby Forest Ayurveda Over Generic Terms
A detailed overview of the trademark dispute between Forest Essentials and Baby Forest Ayurveda, highlighting the complexities of protecting generic terms in competitive markets. Learn about the Delhi High Court’s ruling, the arguments from both parties, and the implications for trademark law and brand identity.
Read more
TRADEMARK BATTLE: DOMINO’S FACES OFF AGAINST DONITO’S IN THE BATTLE OF LOGOS
Trademark conflicts are common for renowned brands like NIKE, APPLE, and GUCCI. Domino’s is no stranger to such disputes. This article addresses various trademark infringement cases, focusing on the recent conflict between Domino’s India and a Punjab-based food outlet named “Donito’s.” The article also explores relevant Indian intellectual property laws, particularly the Trademark Act, 1999, and examines the legal framework for resolving these disputes.
Read more
