
DEFENSE OF ‘DE MINIMIS’ IN IP MATTERS IN INDIA
This article explains the De Minimis principle in Indian IP law, showing how courts disregard trivial copyright infringements to prevent unnecessary litigation.

This article explains the De Minimis principle in Indian IP law, showing how courts disregard trivial copyright infringements to prevent unnecessary litigation.

This article explores colour trademarks in India, explaining how businesses can legally protect unique colours as part of their brand identity. It covers the legal framework under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the types of colour marks (single colours and colour combinations), challenges in registration, key judicial cases like Cadbury

This article examines the key GST amendments proposed in the Union Budget 2026–27 through the Finance Bill, 2026, covering changes to valuation, credit notes, refunds, and intermediary services. It analyses these reforms within the constitutional framework of Articles 246A and 279A and considers relevant Supreme Court decisions, highlighting their impact

This article explores trademark bullying in India, examining legal provisions under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, judicial safeguards, and the need for reforms to ensure fair competition and protect smaller businesses.

This article examines the delicate balance between innovation and competition by exploring how Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law interact in India. It highlights their complementary roles in fostering creativity through exclusive rights while preventing market abuses to ensure fair competition and consumer welfare.

The reduction in pre-deposit requirements for GST appeals under Sections 107(6) and 112(8) of the CGST Act, introduced through the Finance Act, 2024, marks a significant reform in India’s indirect tax framework. By lowering the pre-deposit for appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) from 20% to 10% of the

The Madras High Court’s ruling in The Procter & Gamble Company v. IPI India Pvt. Ltd. marks a significant development in Indian trademark jurisprudence by reaffirming that descriptive and publici juris terms cannot be monopolized without clear proof of acquired distinctiveness. In rejecting P&G’s claim over the prefix “Vapo” derived

The landmark Supreme Court case of Parle Products (P) Ltd. vs. J.P. & Co. (1972) is a pivotal judgment in Indian trademark law that clarified the concept of deceptive similarity and trade dress infringement. The Court held that overall visual impression, packaging, colour scheme, and design must be considered when

An in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2026–27 examining its growth strategy, sectoral priorities, fiscal discipline, and the limited relief offered to middle class taxpayers.

This article analyses the UGC Equity Regulations, 2026, focusing on the objectives, key mechanisms such as Equal Opportunity Centres, the resulting controversy, and the Supreme Court’s stay due to concerns of vagueness, misuse, and constitutional validity.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:
The information provided on this website is solely available at user’s own request for informational purposes only and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.